Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
Date
Msg-id 20240311211204.GA1786481@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Reports on obsolete Postgres versions  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:37:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>     https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
> 
> This web page should correct the idea that "upgrades are more risky than
> staying with existing versions".  Is there more we can do?  Should we
> have a more consistent response for such reporters?

I've read that the use of the term "minor release" can be confusing.  While
the versioning page clearly describes what is eligible for a minor release,
not everyone reads it, so I suspect that many folks think there are new
features, etc. in minor releases.  I think a "minor release" of Postgres is
more similar to what other projects would call a "patch version."

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions