Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id 20240306074106.mg6w4koohdlworbs@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On 2024-03-05 16:41:30 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I'd like to push 0001 and 0002 shortly, and then do another sweep over
> 0003, with remaining feedback, and get that in so we get some
> buildfarm testing before the remaining polishing work on
> tidstore/vacuum.

A few ARM buildfarm animals are complaining:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A02
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=snakefly&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A03
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=massasauga&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A33%3A18

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mats Kindahl
Date:
Subject: Re: Hooking into ExplainOneQuery() complicated by missing standard_ExplainOneQuery
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum