On 2024-Jan-30, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> some basic variant (without autovacuum support) can be good enough. We have
> no autovacuum support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY and I don't see a necessity
> for it (sure, it can be limited by my perspective) . The necessity of
> reducing table size is not too common (a lot of use cases are better
> covered by using partitioning), but sometimes it is, and then buildin
> simple available solution can be helpful.
That's my thinking as well.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
