Hi,
On 2024-01-18 14:00:58 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > The LockBufHdr also used init_local_spin_delay / perform_spin_delay
> > infrastruce and then it has the same issue like ${subject}, it is pretty
> > like the code in s_lock; Based on my current knowledge, I think we
> > should add the check there.
>
> I'd like to hear from Andres, if possible. @Andres: Should these
> sanity checks apply only to spin locks per se, or also to buffer
> header locks?
They also should apply to buffer header locks. The exact same dangers apply
there. The only reason this isn't using a plain spinlock is that this way we
can modify more state with a single atomic operation. But all the dangers of
using spinlocks apply just as well.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
