Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time
Date
Msg-id 20240109034722.GA3031061@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:23:11PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:37:14PM +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> I was reviewing new changes, and found out that we now have
>> "wal_summary_keep_time" setting, but the docs
>> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/runtime-config-wal.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-WAL-SUMMARIZATION)
>> say that it's boolean, while it is integer.
> 
> Indeed.  I'll try to get this committed tonight unless Robert beats me to
> it.

I noticed that the docs also fail to mention how the value of this
parameter is interpreted when specified without units, so I've put together
a v2 patch that fixes this, too.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18261: Inconsistent results of SELECT affected by joined subqueries
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: BUG #18267: Logical replication bug: data is not synchronized after Alter Publication.