Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date
Msg-id 20240108171848.GB2611898@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 11:13:42AM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> +void *
> +dsm_registry_init_or_attach(const char *key, size_t size,
> 
> I think the name could be simple as dsm_registry_init() like we use
> elsewhere e.g. ShmemInitHash() which doesn't say attach explicitly.

That seems reasonable to me.

> Similarly, I think dshash_find_or_insert() can be as simple as
> dshash_search() and
> accept HASHACTION like hash_search().

I'm not totally sure what you mean here.  If you mean changing the dshash
API, I'd argue that's a topic for another thread.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Next
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2024-01 first week update