On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> That's a more compelling reason IMO. I'm not sure if I prefer the
> GUC_check_errdetail-like approach better, I would for sure not be opposed to
> reviewing a version of the patch doing it that way.
>
> Tung Nguyen: are you interested in updating the patch along these lines
> suggested by Nathan?
I gave it a try.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com