On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:18:05PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Barring objections or additional feedback, I think I'm inclined to press
> forward with this one and commit it in the next week or two. I'm currently
> planning to keep the inline assembly, but I'm considering removing the
> configuration checks for __atomic_exchange_n() if the availability of
> __atomic_compare_exchange_n() seems like a reliable indicator of its
> presence. Thoughts?
Concretely, like this.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
