Re: common signal handler protection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: common signal handler protection
Date
Msg-id 20231121224006.GA3747740@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to common signal handler protection  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: common signal handler protection
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:20:08PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +#ifdef NSIG
> +#define PG_NSIG (NSIG)
> +#else
> +#define PG_NSIG (64)            /* XXX: wild guess */
> +#endif

> +    Assert(signo < PG_NSIG);

cfbot seems unhappy with this on Windows.  IIUC we need to use
PG_SIGNAL_COUNT there instead, but I'd like to find a way to have just one
macro for all platforms.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing baserel to foreignrel in postgres_fdw functions
Next
From: Ivan Trofimov
Date:
Subject: WIP: libpq: add a possibility to not send D(escribe) when executing a prepared statement