Re: pg_checksums? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter J. Holzer
Subject Re: pg_checksums?
Date
Msg-id 20231030100309.qepfu2hir2ewfggb@hjp.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_checksums?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_checksums?  (Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2023-10-29 13:26:27 -0500, Ron wrote:
> On 10/29/23 12:57, Paul Förster wrote:
> > Safe in the sense that, if I enable checksums on a replica, switch
> > over and the enable checksums on the other side, if this is ok, or
> > whether future mutations on the primary will corrupt the replica.
>
> Trying it would tell you something.
>
> > That's why I asked if I need to perform a patronictl reinit.
>
> Best to ask Percona.

Why Percona?

        hp

--
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) |                    |
| |   | hjp@hjp.at         |    -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |       challenge!"

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_checksums?
Next
From: yangsr3411
Date:
Subject: Fw: Server process exited with exit code 4