Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
Date
Msg-id 20230915163538.GA1960964@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 03:04:19PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The only reason I didn't apply this already is because IMHO we should
> adjust the worker types and the documentation for the view to be
> consistent.  For example, the docs say "leader apply worker" but the view
> just calls them "apply" workers.  The docs say "synchronization worker" but
> the view calls them "table synchronization" workers.  My first instinct is
> to call apply workers "leader apply" workers in the view, and to call table
> synchronization workers "table synchronization workers" in the docs.

Concretely, like this.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement a column store for pg?
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Small patch modifying variable name to reflect the logic involved