On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 03:04:19PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The only reason I didn't apply this already is because IMHO we should
> adjust the worker types and the documentation for the view to be
> consistent. For example, the docs say "leader apply worker" but the view
> just calls them "apply" workers. The docs say "synchronization worker" but
> the view calls them "table synchronization" workers. My first instinct is
> to call apply workers "leader apply" workers in the view, and to call table
> synchronization workers "table synchronization workers" in the docs.
Concretely, like this.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
