On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 05:06:28PM +0300, Maxim Orlov wrote:
> I did a look at the patch, like the idea. The overall code is in a good
> condition, implements the described feature.
Thanks for reviewing.
> Side note: this is not a problem of this particular patch, but in
> pg_stat_get_subscription and many other places, there
> is a switch with worker types. Can we use a default section there to have
> an explicit error instead of the compiler
> warnings if somehow we decide to add another one worker type?
-1. We want such compiler warnings to remind us to adjust the code
accordingly. If we just rely on an ERROR in the default section, we might
miss it if there isn't a relevant test.
> So, should we mark this thread as RfC?
I've done so. Barring additional feedback, I intend to commit this in the
next few days.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com