Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date
Msg-id 20230822171110.GA711171@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 12:53:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:06:32PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> This would look something like the attached patch.  I think this is nicer.
>> With this patch, we don't have to choose between including fd.h or
>> redefining the macros in the frontend code.
> 
> Yes, this one is moving the needle in the good direction.  +1.

Great.  Here is a new patch set that includes this change as well as the
suggested documentation updates.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: DecodeInterval fixes
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Allow tailoring of ICU locales with custom rules