Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Would it be possible to backpatch Close support in libpq (28b5726) to PG16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Would it be possible to backpatch Close support in libpq (28b5726) to PG16?
Date
Msg-id 20230815223920.upweeqc6uwcmidou@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Would it be possible to backpatch Close support in libpq (28b5726) to PG16?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Would it be possible to backpatch Close support in libpq (28b5726) to PG16?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2023-Aug-16, Michael Paquier wrote:

> > Personally I think backpatching 28b5726 has a really low risk of
> > breaking anything.
> 
> I agree about the low-risk argument, though.  This is just new code.

Here's a way to think about it.  If 16.1 was already out, would we add
libpq support for Close to 16.2?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La rebeldía es la virtud original del hombre" (Arthur Schopenhauer)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging of matching pg_hba.conf entry during auth skips trust auth, potential security issue
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging of matching pg_hba.conf entry during auth skips trust auth, potential security issue