Hi,
On 2023-08-11 18:30:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:25 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >> We could a test that fails when there's some mis-indented code. That seems
> >> like it might catch things earlier?
>
> +1 for including this in CI tests
I didn't even mean CI - I meant 'make check-world' / 'meson test'. Which of
course would include CI automatically.
> > It definitely would. That would go a long way towards addressing my
> > concerns. But I suspect that that would run into problems that stem
> > from the fact that the buildfarm is testing something that isn't all
> > that simple. Don't typedefs need to be downloaded from some other
> > blessed buildfarm animal?
>
> No. I presume koel is using src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list,
> which has always been the "canonical" list but up to now we've
> been lazy about maintaining it. Part of the new regime is that
> typedefs.list should now be updated on-the-fly by patches that
> add new typedefs.
Yea. Otherwise nobody else can indent reliably, without repeating the work of
adding typedefs.list entries of all the patches since the last time it was
updated in the repository.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
