Re: Using defines for protocol characters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date
Msg-id 20230809165147.GA1385791@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using defines for protocol characters  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Using defines for protocol characters
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:44:42AM -0600, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 10:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I agree with Peter: let's use the names in the protocol document
>> with a single prefix.  I've got mixed feelings about whether that prefix
>> should have an underscore, though.
> 
> Well, we're getting closer :)

I'm +0.5 for the underscore.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of additional index columns in rows filtering