Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date
Msg-id 20230808200606.GA1384393@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I ran a couple of tests for pg_upgrade with 100k tables (created using the
script here [0]) in order to demonstrate the potential benefits of this
patch.

pg_upgrade --sync-method fsync
    real    5m50.072s
    user    0m10.606s
    sys     0m40.298s

pg_upgrade --sync-method syncfs
    real    3m44.096s
    user    0m8.906s
    sys     0m26.398s

pg_upgrade --no-sync
    real    3m27.697s
    user    0m9.056s
    sys     0m26.605s

[0] https://postgr.es/m/3612876.1689443232%40sss.pgh.pa.us

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of additional index columns in rows filtering
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of additional index columns in rows filtering