Re: Using defines for protocol characters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date
Msg-id 20230808062740.uvljfvr3sy7g7ulf@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using defines for protocol characters  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023-Aug-07, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:02:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes:

> >> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is
> >> acceptable ?
> > 
> > I'm good with Robert's proposal above.
> 
> +1

WFM as well.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough."
https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.