On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:00:32AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 09:28:08AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> > FTR we had to entirely ignore all those statements in powa years ago to try to
> > make the tool usable in such case for some users who where using 2pc, it would
> > be nice to be able to track them back for pg16+.
>
> That would be nice for your users.
Indeed, although I will need to make that part a runtime variable based on the
server version rather than a hardcoded string since the extension framework
doesn't provide a way to do that cleanly across major pg versions.
> Are there more query patterns you'd
> be interested in grouping in the backend? I had a few folks aiming
> for CallStmt and SetStmt, but both a a bit tricky without a custom
> routine.
Looking at the rest of the ignored patterns, the only remaining one would be
DEALLOCATE, which AFAICS doesn't have a query_jumble_ignore tag for now.
