Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j
Date
Msg-id 20230524173417.yfj5v7nvdhmggxno@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 15 pg_upgrade with -j  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2023-May-23, Ron wrote:

> We'd never hardlink.  Eliminates the ability to return to the old system if
> something goes wrong.

If you'd never hardlink, then you should run your test without the -k
option.  Otherwise, the timings are meaningless.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La vida es para el que se aventura"



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: confused by int2vector typdelim
Next
From: Pavel Horal
Date:
Subject: Question regarding specifics of GIN and pg_trgm performance and potential use of show_trgm to improve it