On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 01:20:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> Fixed.
>
> v2 looks good to me, except the documentation wording for --with-role
> is needlessly inconsistent with --with-admin. The --with-admin
> wording looks better, so I suggest
>
> - Indicates the specified existing role should be automatically
> + Specifies an existing role that will be automatically
> added as a member of the new role. Multiple existing roles can
Will do.
>> How do folks feel about keeping --role undocumented? Should we give it a
>> mention in the docs for --member-of?
>
> I'm okay with leaving it undocumented, but I won't fight about it
> if somebody wants to argue for the other.
Alright. Barring any additional feedback, I'll commit this tonight.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
