Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date
Msg-id 20230519230438.e6rskh3yjz3mutm2@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16  (MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2023-05-19 15:44:09 -0700, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have two more runs of the benchmark in progress so we will have 3
> >> results for each of the test cases to confirm that the small regressions
> >> are repeatable.
> >>
> >
> I repeated the benchmark a few times using a more recent PG16 build (git
> sha 08c45ae2) and have yet to see any significant changes. So that is good
> news. My testing scripts have been improved so I should be able to finish
> the next round of tests in less time.

With "yet to see any significant changes" do you mean that the runs are
comparable with earlier runs, showing the same regression? Or that the
regression vanished? Or ...?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready