On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:39:42AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 4 May 2023, at 14:18, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> On 4 May 2023, at 14:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Hmm, I'm kinda -1 on them having the same name visible in the
>>> contexts dump --- that seems very confusing. How about naming
>>> the hash "EventTriggerCacheHash" or so?
>>
>> I think the level is the indicator here, but I have no strong opinions,
>> EventTriggerCacheHash is fine by me.
>
> The attached trivial diff does that, parking this in the next CF.
+1 for EventTriggerCacheHash
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
