Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date
Msg-id 20230420233243.GB1437940@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:38:34AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> While here, I wonder if we should document what BGW_MAXLEN is defined as in
> bgworker.sgml?

I am -0.5 for this.  If you are writing a new background worker, it's
probably reasonable to expect that you can locate the definition of
BGW_MAXLEN.  Also, I think there's a good chance that we'd forget to update
such documentation the next time we adjust it.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs