On 2023-Apr-18, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> While I'm certain that nobody will agree with me on every little
> detail, I have to imagine that most would find my preferred ordering
> quite understandable and unsurprising, at a high level -- this is not
> a hopelessly idiosyncratic ranking, that could just as easily have
> been generated by a PRNG. People may not easily agree that "apples are
> more important than oranges, or vice-versa", but what does it matter?
> I've really only put each option into buckets of items with *roughly*
> the same importance. All of the details beyond that don't matter to
> me, at all.
I agree with you that roughly bucketing items is a good approach.
Within each bucket we can then sort alphabetically.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you
not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)
