Re: monitoring usage count distribution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Date
Msg-id 20230408001816.GA519579@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: monitoring usage count distribution  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is consensus for 0002, but I reviewed and pushed
> 0001.  I made one non-cosmetic change: it no longer skips invalid
> buffers.  Otherwise, the row for usage count 0 would be pretty useless.
> Also it seemed to me that sum(buffers) ought to agree with the
> shared_buffers setting.

Makes sense.  Thanks!

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints