Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date
Msg-id 20230407213332.l2upiiqtigmnqvf2@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
I gave a very quick look at 0001 and 0003.  I find no fault with 0001.
It was clear back when we added that stuff that invalidated_at was not
terribly useful -- I was just too conservative to not have it -- but now
that a lot of time has passed and we haven't done anything with it,
removing it seems perfectly OK.

As for 0003, I have no further concerns about the translatability.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El miedo atento y previsor es la madre de la seguridad" (E. Burke)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Next
From: Yurii Rashkovskii
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen