Re: monitoring usage count distribution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Date
Msg-id 20230406180608.GA275542@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: monitoring usage count distribution  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: monitoring usage count distribution
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 01:32:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> There seems to be enough support for the existing summary function
> definition to leave it as-is; Andres likes it for one, and I'm not
> excited about trying to persuade him he's wrong.  But a second
> slightly-less-aggregated summary function is clearly useful as well.
> So I'm now thinking that we do want the patch as-submitted.
> (Caveat: I've not read the patch, just the description.)

In case we want to do both, here's a 0002 that changes usagecount_avg to an
array of usage counts.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints