Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 20230307181844.hxnlfi3wa5lm7sm2@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2023-03-06 15:21:14 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> Good point. Attached is what you suggested. I committed the transaction
> before the drop table so that the statistics would be visible when we
> queried pg_stat_io.

Pushed, thanks for the report, analysis and fix, Tom, Horiguchi-san, Melanie.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()