On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:29:09AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:40:13AM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2023-Feb-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> I don't think it makes sense to run postgres -C huge_pages_active,
> >> however, so I see no issue that that would always returns "false".
> >
> > Hmm, I would initialize it to return "unknown" rather than "off" — and
> > make sure it turns "off" at the appropriate time. Otherwise you're just
> > moving the confusion elsewhere.
>
> I think this approach would address my concerns about using a GUC.
Done that way. This also fixes the logic in win32_shmem.c.
--
Justin
