Hi,
On 2023-02-13 14:06:57 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > The patch calls update_progress in change_cb_wrapper and other
> > > wrappers which will miss the case of DDLs that generates a lot of data
> > > that is not processed by the plugin. I think for that we either need
> > > to call update_progress from reorderbuffer.c similar to what the patch
> > > has removed or we need some other way to address it. Do you have any
> > > better idea?
> >
> > I don't mind calling something like update_progress() in the specific cases
> > that's needed, but I think those are just the
> > if (!RelationIsLogicallyLogged(relation))
> > if (relation->rd_rel->relrewrite && !rb->output_rewrites))
> >
> > To me it makes a lot more sense to call update_progress() for those, rather
> > than generally.
> >
>
> Won't it be better to call it wherever we don't invoke any wrapper
> function like for cases REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INVALIDATION, sequence
> changes, etc.? I was thinking that wherever we don't call the wrapper
> function which means we don't have a chance to invoke
> update_progress(), the timeout can happen if there are a lot of such
> messages.
ISTM that the likelihood of causing harm due to increased overhead is higher
than the gain.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
