Re: recovery modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: recovery modules
Date
Msg-id 20230201212326.GA3593344@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: recovery modules  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: recovery modules
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 01:06:06PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-02-01 12:15:29 -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Here's a new patch set in which I've attempted to address this feedback and
>> Michael's feedback.
> 
> Looks better!

Thanks!

>> @@ -25,12 +34,14 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT char *XLogArchiveLibrary;
>>   * For more information about the purpose of each callback, refer to the
>>   * archive modules documentation.
>>   */
>> -typedef bool (*ArchiveCheckConfiguredCB) (void);
>> -typedef bool (*ArchiveFileCB) (const char *file, const char *path);
>> -typedef void (*ArchiveShutdownCB) (void);
>> +typedef void (*ArchiveStartupCB) (ArchiveModuleState *state);
>> +typedef bool (*ArchiveCheckConfiguredCB) (ArchiveModuleState *state);
>> +typedef bool (*ArchiveFileCB) (const char *file, const char *path, ArchiveModuleState *state);
>> +typedef void (*ArchiveShutdownCB) (ArchiveModuleState *state);
> 
> Personally I'd always pass ArchiveModuleState *state as the first arg,
> but it's not important.

Yeah, that's nicer.  cfbot is complaining about a missing #include, so I
need to send a new revision anyway.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning