Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"
Date
Msg-id 20230201043013.GA3194884@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:39:56AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I noticed that time.h is no longer needed by the archiver, so I removed
> that and fixed an indentation nitpick in the attached v2.  I'm going to set
> the commitfest entry to ready-for-committer shortly after sending this
> message.

I'm not sure why I thought time.h was no longer needed.  time() is clearly
used elsewhere in this file.  Here's a new version with that added back.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication timeout problem