On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:37:29PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > BTW, I didn't realize it when I made the suggestion, nor when I wrote > the patch, but a GUC was implemented in the v2 patch. > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TU4PR8401MB1152CB4FEB99658BC6B35543EECF9%40TU4PR8401MB1152.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM > Whether it's a GUC or a function, I propose to name it hugepages_active. > If there's no objections, I'll add to the CF. As such, I re-opened the previous CF. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3310/
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных