Re: recovery modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: recovery modules
Date
Msg-id 20230130200422.GA2797238@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: recovery modules  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: recovery modules
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:48:10AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think _PG_archive_module_init() should actually allocate a memory
> context and do other similar initializations. Instead it should just return
> 'const ArchiveModuleCallbacks*', typically a single line.
> 
> Allocations etc should happen in one of the callbacks. That way we can
> actually have multiple instances of a module.

I think we'd need to invent a startup callback for archive modules for this
to work, but that's easy enough.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw uninterruptible during connection establishment / ProcSignalBarrier
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests