Re: Remove source code display from \df+? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Remove source code display from \df+?
Date
Msg-id 20230122191549.5b35ulimlvz42y7l@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove source code display from \df+?  (Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Remove source code display from \df+?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023-Jan-22, Isaac Morland wrote:

> I’ve re-written the tests to create a test-specific role and functions so
> there is no longer a dependency on the superuser name.

This one would fail the sanity check that all roles created by
regression tests need to have names that start with "regress_".

> I pondered the notion of going with the flow and just leaving out the
> tests but that seemed like giving up too easily.

I think avoiding even more untested code is good, so +1 for keeping at
it.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"At least to kernel hackers, who really are human, despite occasional
rumors to the contrary" (LWN.net)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner