Hi,
On 2023-01-19 13:36:41 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:58 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > There's absolutely no guarantee that autoanalyze is triggered
> > there. Particularly with repeated vacuums triggered due to an relfrozenxid age
> > that can't be advanced that very well might not happen within days on a large
> > relation.
>
> Arguments like that work far better as arguments in favor of the
> vac_estimate_reltuples heuristics.
I don't agree. But mainly my issue is that the devil you know (how this has
worked for a while) is preferrable to introducing an unknown quantity (your
patch that hasn't yet seen real world exposure).
Greetings,
Andres Freund
