Re: add \dpS to psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: add \dpS to psql
Date
Msg-id 20230109174539.GA1112921@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: add \dpS to psql  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: add \dpS to psq [16beta1]
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 11:18:59AM +0000, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> It might be true that temp tables aren't usually interesting from a
> permissions point of view, but it's not hard to imagine situations
> where interesting things do happen. It's also probably the case that
> most users won't have many temp tables, so I don't think including
> them by default will be particularly intrusive.
> 
> Also, from a user perspective, I think it would be something of a POLA
> violation for \dp[S] and \dt[S] to include different sets of tables,
> though I appreciate that we do that now. There's nothing in the docs
> to indicate that that's the case.

Agreed.

> Anyway, I've pushed the v2 patch as-is. If anyone feels strongly
> enough that we should change its behaviour for temp tables, then we
> can still discuss that.

Thanks!

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Common function for percent placeholder replacement