On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:34:37AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:16 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In v12, I moved the restart for two_phase mode to the end of
>> process_syncing_tables_for_apply() so that we don't need to rely on another
>> iteration of the loop.
>
> This should work but it is better to add a comment before calling
> CommandCounterIncrement() to indicate that this is for making changes
> to the relation state visible.
Will do.
> Thinking along similar lines, won't apply worker need to be notified
> of SUBREL_STATE_SYNCWAIT state change by the tablesync worker?
wait_for_worker_state_change() should notify the apply worker in this case.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
