Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local
Date
Msg-id 20230102234636.pjjverdgenv64qvl@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-12-29 13:40:13 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Should we backpatch this? Given the volume of warnings it's probably a good
> > > idea. But I'd let it step in HEAD for a few days of buildfarm coverage first.
> > 
> > +1 to both points.
> 
> Pushed to HEAD.

I haven't seen any problems in HEAD, so I'm working on backpatching.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Next
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences