On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 06:25:48PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:17 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > The original code rechecks rte->checkAsUser with the rte of the parent
> > rel. The patch changed to access onerel instead, but that's not updated
> > after looping to find the parent.
> >
> > Is that okay ? It doesn't seem intentional, since "userid" is still
> > being recomputed, but based on onerel, which hasn't changed. The
> > original intent (since 553d2ec27) is to recheck the parent's
> > "checkAsUser".
> >
> > It seems like this would matter for partitioned tables, when the
> > partition isn't readable, but its parent is, and accessed via a view
> > owned by another user?
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> I think these blocks which are rewriting userid to basically the same
> value should have been removed from these sites as part of 599b33b94.
I thought maybe; thanks for checking.
Little nitpicks:
001:
Fine to use the same userid as it's same in all
=> the same
002:
give that it's a subquery rel.
=> given
--
Justin
