Hi,
On 2022-11-22 12:51:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:01:18PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments.
>
> > @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef enum
> > WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL,
> > WAIT_EVENT_REGISTER_SYNC_REQUEST,
> > WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_DELAY,
> > - WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE
> > + WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE,
> > + WAIT_EVENT_SPIN_DELAY
> > } WaitEventTimeout;
>
> That would be fine for stable branches, but could you keep that in an
> alphabetical order on HEAD?
Fair point. I wasn't planning to backpatch.
Greetings,
Andres Freund