Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events
Date
Msg-id 20221122041708.mwwfyvnld2q76ssl@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-11-22 12:51:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:01:18PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments.
> 
> > @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef enum
> >      WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL,
> >      WAIT_EVENT_REGISTER_SYNC_REQUEST,
> >      WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_DELAY,
> > -    WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE
> > +    WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE,
> > +    WAIT_EVENT_SPIN_DELAY
> >  } WaitEventTimeout;
> 
> That would be fine for stable branches, but could you keep that in an
> alphabetical order on HEAD?

Fair point. I wasn't planning to backpatch.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION