Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter J. Holzer
Subject Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers?
Date
Msg-id 20221119085225.uivmxue2gef5utv2@hjp.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers?  (Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2022-11-18 16:21:18 -0600, Ron wrote:
> On 11/18/22 16:13, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > So you can give these credentials to you developers or devops folks
> > (whom you trust not attack the system -
>
> They like to "fix" things without documenting what they did, and then, when
> something breaks, denying they did anything (or honestly not believing that
> whatever "trivial" thing they did could any major or deliterious impact).

Which is why you want to automate deployments. When the easiest way to
fix something in production is to just push the change into the repo,
this is what people will do. When doing it the "proper" way is much more
complicated than just fudging it, people will do the latter.

        hp

--
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) |                    |
| |   | hjp@hjp.at         |    -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |       challenge!"

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ken Tanzer
Date:
Subject: Re: Duda sobre como imprimir un campo INTERVAL
Next
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: Duda sobre como imprimir un campo INTERVAL