On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 03:00:55PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:21:18PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>> Now that I see the fix for the implicit conversion:
>>
>> L527: + nap = Max(0, (nextWakeup - now + 999) / 1000);
>> ..
>> L545: + (int) Min(INT_MAX, nap),
>>
>>
>> I think limiting the naptime at use is confusing. Don't we place these
>> adjacently? Then we could change the nap to an integer. Or we can
>> just assert out for the nap time longer than INT_MAX (but this would
>> require another int64 variable. I belive we won't need such a long
>> nap, (or that is no longer a nap?)
>
> Yeah, I guess this deserves a comment. I could also combine it easily:
>
> nap = (int) Min(INT_MAX, Max(0, (nextWakeup - now + 999) / 1000));
Here is a new version of the patch that addresses this feedback.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
