Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver
Date
Msg-id 20221010181014.GC993859@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:51:14AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> +                /* Find the soonest wakeup time, to limit our nap. */
>> +                nextWakeup = INT64_MAX;
>> +                for (int i = 0; i < NUM_WALRCV_WAKEUPS; ++i)
>> +                    nextWakeup = Min(state.wakeup[i], nextWakeup);
>> +                nap = Max(0, (nextWakeup - now + 999) / 1000);

Hm.  We should probably be more cautious here since nextWakeup is an int64
and nap is an int.  My guess is that we should just set nap to -1 if
nextWakeup > INT_MAX.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] \g with multiple result sets and \watch with copy queries
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] \g with multiple result sets and \watch with copy queries