Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id 20220922184613.GA695971@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:33:46PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Another question on this feature: Currently, if archive_library is set,
> archive_command is ignored.  I think if both are set, it should be an error.
> Compare for example what happens if you set multiple recovery_target_xxx
> settings.  I don't think silently turning off one setting by setting another
> is a good behavior.

Peter, would you like to proceed with something like [0] to resolve this?
If so, I will work on cleaning the patch up.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/20220914222736.GA3042279%40nathanxps13

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marina Polyakova
Date:
Subject: Re: ICU for global collation
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Pruning never visible changes