Re: postgres_fdw hint messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: postgres_fdw hint messages
Date
Msg-id 20220902212609.GA1216541@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw hint messages  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw hint messages
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 04:31:20PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 07:08:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (1) there probably needs to be some threshold of closeness, so we don't
>> offer "foobar" when the user wrote "huh"
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> (2) there are several places doing this now, and there will no doubt
>> be more later, so we need to try to abstract the logic so it can be
>> shared.
> 
> Will do.

Here is a new patch.  Two notes:

* I considered whether to try to unite this new functionality with the
existing stuff in parse_relation.c, but the existing code looked a bit too
specialized.

* I chose a Levenshtein distance of 5 as the threshold of closeness for the
hint messages.  This felt lenient, but it should hopefully still filter out
some of the more ridiculous suggestions.  However, it's still little more
than a wild guess, so if folks think the threshold needs to be higher or
lower, I'd readily change it.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Backpatching nbtree VACUUM (page deletion) hardening
Next
From: Melih Mutlu
Date:
Subject: Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI