On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:45:10AM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:57 AM Nathan Bossart
> <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The ARM literature appears to indicate that Neon support is pretty standard
>> on aarch64, and AFAICT it's pretty common to just assume it's available.
>
> This doesn't exactly rise to the level of "find out for sure", so I
> went looking myself. This is the language I found [1]:
>
> "Both floating-point and NEON are required in all standard ARMv8
> implementations. However, implementations targeting specialized
> markets may support the following combinations:
>
> No NEON or floating-point.
> Full floating-point and SIMD support with exception trapping.
> Full floating-point and SIMD support without exception trapping."
Sorry, I should've linked to the documentation I found. I saw similar
language in a couple of manuals, which is what led me to the conclusion
that Neon support is relatively standard.
> Since we assume floating-point, I see no reason not to assume NEON,
> but a case could be made for documenting that we require NEON on
> aarch64, in addition to exception trapping (for CRC runtime check) and
> floating point on any Arm. Or even just say "standard". I don't
> believe anyone will want to run Postgres on specialized hardware
> lacking these features, so maybe it's a moot point.
I'm okay with assuming Neon support for now. It's probably easier to add
the __ARM_NEON check if/when someone complains than it is to justify
removing it once it's there.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
