Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date
Msg-id 20220803210129.xeirh4kvuwuvp4jm@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-08-03 16:46:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > Or we could disable autovacuum on the new cluster, which I think is a
> > better solution. I like it when things match exactly; it makes me feel
> > that the universe is well-ordered.
> 
> Again, this seems to me to be breaking the test's real-world applicability
> for a (false?) sense of stability.

Yea, that doesn't seem like an improvement. I e.g. found the issues around
relfilenode reuse in 15 due to autovacuum running in the pg_upgrade target
cluster.  And I recall other bugs in the area...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Clarifying Commitfest policies