Re: A test for replay of regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date
Msg-id 20220803153050.GC19644@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A test for replay of regression tests  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:10:23PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> This adds 2 whole minutes to the recovery check, when running with the
> Windows serial-only scripts on Cirrus CI (using Andres's CI patches).
> For Linux it adds ~20 seconds to the total of -j8 check-world.
> Hopefully that's time well spent, because it adds test coverage for
> all the redo routines, and hopefully soon we won't have to run 'em in
> series on Windows.

Should 027-stream-regress be renamed to something that starts earlier ?
Off-list earlier this year, Andres referred to 000.

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints